Part II: To continue my deception experiment, I decided to call up my friend the next day when I knew he had a break from work. He told me how bored he was at work and thanked me for rescuing him with my phonecall. He asked what I was up to, and I thought that this would be the perfect time to tell the truth about what I did last weekend. I told him that I was uploading pictures onto my computer from my friend's surprise birthday party last weekend. I told him how I helped throw her a surprise birthday party at Stella's for her 21st. As I went into detail about how I contacted all of her friends with personalized invitations, I could sense the confusion in his voice. I mentioned how I was planning the party for weeks and how many times she almost found out about the party. In the middle of my talking about how I had a friend pretend they would be taking her to dinner at Stella's, he finally asked how I could have possibly went to New York City for the weekend and planned an elaborated birthday party in Ithaca. I used lean media, the telephone, in the second scenario.
Part III: Afterwards, I asked him to tell me which traveling story was the truth and which one was a lie. He hesitated for a second and then informed me that he thought the second story was a lie. The result of the experiment was that the truth was not detected correctly for the lean media. Instead, the lie was reasoned to be true, in light of the rich media.
To accomplish my lying, I worked on my self-presentation goals- i.e. appearing honest. The deception strategy that I used was lying subtly. I had in fact attended a Paramore concert at the Crazy Donkey, but had done so two summers ago. Thus, we did not have to stumble over inventing details because we had somewhere to draw from. I think that this helped to accomplish lying because there were no nonverbal cues to pick up that would help him to detect any deception on my end. In addition, I knew that since the media used was rich, I needed to make sure that my self-presentation was methodical. However, with respect to the use of the lean media, the telephone, I realize that the only thing that my friend had to focus his attention was the content with which we told our initial lie. When it came to discerning which story I told that was a lie we realized that the reason why he had such difficulty was because we had failed to display cues such as gaze aversions or "ah" speech disturbances. Overall, we feel like the truth bias also played a vital role in the outcome of his choice. He believed that I was going to tell the truth when I spoke with him, and trusted that I would not misrepresent myself.
1 comment:
Julia,
Great job for pulling off this deception assignment! Apparently, when I tried my lie on a friend, I got called out for deceiving in a richer media BECAUSE I was trying too hard to appear honest (i.e. going in to way too much detail, talking forever about the lie). I guess, as with my case, people sometimes attend to unreliable, faulty cues. It's interesting that your friend thought you were lying over the phone. One may think that deception detection would be more difficult in a leaner media because the non-verbal and physiological cues are lost. However, your experiment fits in with the social distance theory as well as the feature based approach.
Post a Comment